From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:21:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140620202100.GG21711@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401094871.25902.20.camel@x220>
Paul,
Working through my back-log...
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:01:11AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> ARM_ERRATA_753970 was renamed to PL310_ERRATA_753970 in v3.2, through
> commit fa0ce4035d48 ("ARM: 7162/1: errata: tidy up Kconfig options for
> PL310 errata workarounds"). Two selects were added in v3.15-rc1 that
> still use the previous name. Rename these.
>
> Make these statements depend on CACHE_PL310, like all other selects of
> PL310_ERRATA_753970. That way it will only be selected if its dependency
> is met.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> I reported this before v3.15-rc1. I don't know whether any fixes are
> pending. None are in linux-next.
It looks like rmk just added a patch to fixing the selection of the
erratas. Could you please take a look and either rebase or drop this
patch?
thx,
Jason.
> And ignoring an errata were one
> apparently could be needed sounds, well, scary. Perhaps it is not.
> Anyhow, to make sure this gets fixed, hopefully before v3.15, I'm
> submitting this (untested!) patch.
>
> A related observation. There are three PL310 errata options: one depends
> on CACHE_PL310, three depend on CACHE_L2X0. The one depending on
> CACHE_PL310 is selected only if CACHE_PL310 is set.
>
> But the three depending on CACHE_L2X0 are selected a few times if
> CACHE_L2X0 is set, in other cases if CACHE_PL310 is set, and in some
> cases always. There may be good reasons for this, but it looks odd. I
> know nothing about the PL310 cache and its erratas, so I haven't looked
> into this any further.
>
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> index 3f73eecbcfb0..501d0f42e7b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config MACH_ARMADA_370
> config MACH_ARMADA_375
> bool "Marvell Armada 375 boards" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select ARM_ERRATA_720789
> - select ARM_ERRATA_753970
> + select PL310_ERRATA_753970 if CACHE_PL310
> select ARM_GIC
> select ARMADA_375_CLK
> select CPU_V7
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ config MACH_ARMADA_375
> config MACH_ARMADA_38X
> bool "Marvell Armada 380/385 boards" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select ARM_ERRATA_720789
> - select ARM_ERRATA_753970
> + select PL310_ERRATA_753970 if CACHE_PL310
> select ARM_GIC
> select ARMADA_38X_CLK
> select CPU_V7
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-05 19:01 [GIT PULL 0/8] ARM: SoC: pending changes for 3.15 Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:02 ` [GIT PULL 1/8] ARM: SoC non-critical bug fixes " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/8] ARM: SoC: cleanups " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:04 ` [GIT PULL 3/8] ARM: SoC specific changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-06 9:37 ` Kconfig ARM_ERRATA_753970? Paul Bolle
2014-04-06 17:02 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-04-06 17:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-05-26 9:01 ` [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970 Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 20:21 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-06-20 20:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 21:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 7:58 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 20:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Bolle
2014-06-23 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:34 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-12 11:10 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Bolle
2014-09-12 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-05 9:11 ` Paul Bolle
2014-04-05 19:04 ` [GIT PULL 4/8] ARM: SoC: board changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:05 ` [GIT PULL 5/8] ARM: SoC: device tree changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` [GIT PULL 6/8] ARM: SoC: driver changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` [GIT PULL 7/8] ARM: SoC: sh " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:07 ` [GIT PULL 8/8] ARM: SoC: late cleanups Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140620202100.GG21711@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).