From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752401AbaFVSfH (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:35:07 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:52011 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751838AbaFVSfF (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:35:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:34:50 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Daniel Phillips Cc: James Bottomley , =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Czerner , Pavel Machek , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review Message-ID: <20140622183450.GC5333@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Daniel Phillips , James Bottomley , =?utf-8?B?THVrw6HFoQ==?= Czerner , Pavel Machek , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton References: <20140613103216.GA4589@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <02d3b094-808c-4b17-903d-1280d451704b@phunq.net> <20140613202039.GA23872@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <1402932354.2197.61.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140619082129.GA4309@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <1403378941.2177.24.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:32:03PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: > >That's a bit disingenuous: the concern has always been how page forking > >interacted with writeback. It's not new, it was one of the major things > >brought up at LSF 14 months ago, so you weren't just assigned this. > > [citation needed] http://lwn.net/Articles/548091/ - Ted