From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751920AbaHUOxE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:53:04 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:53178 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751016AbaHUOxC (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:53:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:52:42 -0500 From: Mark Brown To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140821145242.GJ24407@sirena.org.uk> References: <20140820061703.6128f99c@canb.auug.org.au> <20140820155222.GA24407@sirena.org.uk> <5248cecd-03f6-407b-a4a7-1d2989ee0469@email.android.com> <20140822003440.3ffc15c4@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uLcrxnkzOGy8pA6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140822003440.3ffc15c4@canb.auug.org.au> X-Cookie: If you can read this, you're too close. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 208.59.64.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 20 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --uLcrxnkzOGy8pA6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34:40AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:53:56 -0500 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >Are you sure about this? There's a bunch of updates to the tree > > >including one that's supposed to have fixed the build failure on > >PowerPC > > >which haven't made it into the tree, was there a problem with the fetch > > >perhaps? I just checked and cgit says I pushed 23 hours ago so it > > >doesn't look like a problem with the push. > >=20 > > I thought I checked, but I may have missed it, sorry. I will check aga= in before the next linux-next. > The fix appears to be there today, but I dont; think it was for the > previous linux-next. Does it matter that I am currently in Chicago > (despite what the date on this email says :-))? I guess I must have > fetched your tree earlier than you may have expected. Right, that's why I checked that the push really had been the day before as I had expected before I mailed - I'm in Chicago too. Very odd. --uLcrxnkzOGy8pA6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT9ge3AAoJELSic+t+oim9AOYP/0FfywmN4PXhiVOFp7eFhPsc Pi95quB2iNO1koWnTOuzW8VLVrv1stmJ2f22DxXUJgXGcCntmi4zxlGDT7B9QurA 85Ix1LB0oBOqFR0xElW2qeTPVMtkrWphqOvKCgvpe5eZh8MWZR2Ro5Su3/J2ZCKM 1hcDYaZOxwMVVvHiDzREJwcISRJsIS2MLzfJSz9WsEwU2eRBAKjzf6xnIZ9XMZBg EE647wTkLFySPEe6O7p7oGAhSbBZ0NqED+lgIM0PGGMQoxO1prf6zqb65J6Th8au 5HD1sMr1pBVLnef5hnYmu//BmnLdZ3rbJ6uVmU98Ah2rghPnYRd8jVMhqnjLBcKk MKV22qMAfwFgHYaelGxJhpRphDtg+CJGxQqX2dV6R0BbJBGOrtdZgAaybkLFajbX KW2i8/ZAPGwnZ6fgUk1WpV5vrVK7VsXYYbg4S7VpqNuf2Q/fmnyyHTTO+TW4hE9p X0joaalAa6UEaUpd0XwyILiJNCn8kioF/VpkNsqATmOwBxk3GonN34Zt0nZFTAWo xWLJDNhdqYehRnyWL2GlL/xPCtDW2F0dnSTsgjN+SBcGQRj8EGAbk9YgBN9Z97ef FEd0IytkM4gIIbw6jvQvyZRG84plnQKFaKl2GWL/radl7bZkb+GOg1Z71zW13+78 1aDCs/YiKb3z9bOm0/nt =EBHL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uLcrxnkzOGy8pA6s--