From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753753AbaIPK6M (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:58:12 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:23049 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbaIPK6L (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:58:11 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,534,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="477840033" Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:58:02 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Jacob Pan Cc: "David E. Box" , wsa@the-dreams.de, jdelvare@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de, dianders@chromium.org, sjg@chromium.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, maxime.coquelin@st.com, max.schwarz@online.de, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, iivanov@mm-sol.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com, andrew@lunn.ch, skuribay@pobox.com, christian.ruppert@abilis.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: Intel BayTrail PMIC I2C bus support Message-ID: <20140916105802.GE10854@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1410543367-6565-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <20140916094449.GZ10854@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20140916035327.4d3d5555@ultegra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140916035327.4d3d5555@ultegra> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:53:27AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:44:49 +0300 > Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Is this because we need to access the PMIC from host as well? I mean > > from some PMIC driver (which driver btw)? > > > This is used by the X-Powers PMIC. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/1016 Ok, thanks Jacob. So just returning -ENODEV is out of the question :-(