linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	bmr@redhat.com, jcastillo@redhat.com, mguzik@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: Use a seperate wq for do_sync_work() to avoid a potential deadlock
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:44:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140919154423.GH25400@atomlin.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917211613.GU4322@dastard>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:16:13AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >   - Both lru_add_drain and do_sync_work work items are added to
> >     the same global system_wq
> > 
> >   - The current work fn on the system_wq is do_sync_work and is
> >     blocked waiting to aquire an sb's s_umount for reading
> > 
> >   - The umount task is the current owner of the s_umount in
> >     question but is waiting for do_sync_work to continue.
> >     Thus we hit a deadlock situation.
> 
> What kernel did you see this deadlock on?

Sorry for the noise. This deadlock was produced under a kernel whereby
the workqueue implementation is significantly less sophisticated.

-- 
Aaron Tomlin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-19 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-17 11:39 [RFC PATCH] fs: Use a seperate wq for do_sync_work() to avoid a potential deadlock Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-17 18:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-09-17 20:46   ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-17 21:16     ` Dave Chinner
2014-09-19 15:44       ` Aaron Tomlin [this message]
2014-09-17 21:42     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-09-19  9:35       ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140919154423.GH25400@atomlin.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=atomlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=bmr@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jcastillo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).