From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754018AbaIYPoS (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:44:18 -0400 Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:37356 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752604AbaIYPoQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:44:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:44:04 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "Wang, Yalin" , Will Deacon , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , "'linux-mm@kvack.org'" , "'linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org'" , "'Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig'?=" , DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned Message-ID: <20140925154403.GL10390@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103D6DB49161F@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net> <20140919095959.GA2295@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140925143142.GF5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140925143142.GF5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:09:47AM +0100, Wang, Yalin wrote: > > > this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page aligned, > > > so that we can free all memory including the un-page aligned head or tail > > > page of initrd, if the start or end address of initrd are not page > > > aligned, the page can't be freed by free_initrd_mem() function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang > > > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > > > > (as I said, if Russell doesn't have any objections please send the patch > > to his patch system) > > I now have an objection. The patches in the emails were properly formatted. They were so close ;) I can see three patches but none of them exactly right: 8157/1 - wrong diff format 8159/1 - correct format, does not have my ack (you can take this one if you want) 8162/1 - got my ack this time but with the wrong diff format again Maybe a pull request is a better idea. -- Catalin