From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755214AbaI2Tpt (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:45:49 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:35016 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754147AbaI2Tpr (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:45:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:45:30 -0500 From: Felipe Balbi To: Daniel Baluta CC: , Michael Welling , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Cameron , , Peter Meerwald , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] iio: light: add support for TI's opt3001 light sensor Message-ID: <20140929194530.GD1939@saruman> Reply-To: References: <20140919162129.GE26946@saruman.home> <20140922140914.GC25620@saruman> <20140923140924.GA28592@saruman> <20140924143610.GA17997@saruman> <20140925221619.GA10644@saruman> <20140927041959.GA28445@saruman> <20140929140227.GD32403@saruman> <20140929183856.GA11871@sysresccd> <20140929185325.GA1939@saruman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:07:32PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:02:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > Alright, this is already ridiculous. Andrew, if I resend the patch c= an > >> > you apply it since maintainer has been ignoring this thread anyway ? > >> > > >> > >> Do you reall think this is the best way to approach this? > > > > when maintainer doesn't respond for weeks, yeah! Sure it is. >=20 > This is ridiculous! Jonathan asked you some questions about the implement= ation, > but you ignored the request. Instead you've send 9 ping emails! I ignored ? I replied straight away asking him to tell me exactly what he needed and pointing out all the things which he's complaining about that he asked me to get rid of himself. For example, original driver was using devm_*, Jonathan asked to remove, I tried arguing and he said he wanted them out, so I removed, now he's asking me why I didn't use devm_* to start with. That's ridiculous, that's what pointless and a total waste of time. Not to mention that there was a long hiatus from Jonathan for weeks until he said "yeah, sorry, I had forgotten about this". Because of Jonathan alone, we lost a merge window. I send the original driver because v3.17-rc1 was even tagged and now you tell me that it's ridiculous I'm upset with Jonathan's lazy responses ? gimme a break --=20 balbi --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUKbbaAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREq7kP/R0enwo/pG8eVMnXGcuXtxBa JxjEMIC3Cq6/u5J1Wf6SVFVAeIzV56AtAzaVrZYAUNpzIY3PkAeFF3nY5t+rkf30 I+natJVegDDwKoxQRCHE4DSrtNISlR4RYjaFeLm8eNFXyTS+kcb/lUvn2XqtPXbx yq4TcTEd/zQIUDDY8cziUxMB7ORWh13b2LWhVY7psYT34puNd4i6uUgmKe/HtI8e BrcZg+XM/ikJOD2/TMsAcsmg0iV3EKCBDdRnrOBcKcSq4O5/cZjW5ns5cJh9aG3/ RXGPsb6qJ6T3WgPZhQn05kXa07qNB5BKFVT8ICkXSjGUzNzpC9MY6ALT6tQUSAuS 0l8IGqKTwP+fNnpqMpekrfzJyHeJYJJ5/BVLmPMLUo9PP6/CJyvcXK1lffXWh165 RnZ7I4dkxEHfOaF5D846JfhSP26TQ1zmIRqI0pOUAM3JA6dK6P7Ugz0SED+0Cq+H +Ql+kGXeoqDpv2lqgZQU+i0Mb+15rSVkUX7/BOigBn7YwsRvIjsh84XJOEdII1fz RKYOUQCSCSrAc1hJuIsv22EmrnaKAXy110ni9QJh2zLo33cYKN4eR4faz8p39I0+ 3Ws2FFksEscXEu7NgNTraHwheeQBxwxUrI4L59OpKR7BerQiQOOM6vL7B6qUirwl odq4N3X3TBEWNI3AAIpY =KITa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU--