From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752844AbaJFOyJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:54:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:46105 "EHLO mail-qa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752687AbaJFOyH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:54:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:54:03 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing Message-ID: <20141006145403.GB18303@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140924104213.GA2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20140924140844.GB2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20141001153114.GE8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20141005022311.GD8549@htj.dyndns.org> <20141005161646.GB22223@mtj.dyndns.org> <20141006072710.GH8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20141006125817.GA18303@htj.dyndns.org> <20141006132445.GA18339@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141006132445.GA18339@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:24:46PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:58:17AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > I don't think we'd be able to move libata handling to block softirq > > and probably end up just doing it from the irq context. Anyways, as > > long as you're gonna keep working on it, I have no objection to the > > proposed changes. Do you have a refreshed version or is the current > > version good for inclusion? > > No, this one would not apply. I can send updated version on top of > v5 I posted earlier. Should I? Yeap, please do so. Thanks a lot for your patience! :) -- tejun