From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751763AbaJOPbG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:31:06 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:27844 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751429AbaJOPbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:31:04 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 96.249.243.124 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19XE+JAuv9ars6E2PGGpL3r6v9vj0jmJHg= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan DEB985FF72B Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:30:49 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Benoit Masson , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes Message-ID: <20141015153049.GE17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <20141003141102.GJ3895@titan.lakedaemon.net> <542EBB93.108@gmail.com> <542EC3A3.1060605@gmail.com> <1ACB5318-863E-40D8-8B27-41F1C0D0A4B8@perenite.com> <5432BFB1.2060300@gmail.com> <20141015144259.GB17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> <543E898D.10606@gmail.com> <20141015145539.GB18413@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141015145539.GB18413@lunn.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:55:39PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > >Do you have a link to an email thread or the patch Subject line? I can > > >confirm it's missing from mvebu/fixes... > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/275487.html > > > > But you and Andrew should check what Arnd suggested. IIRC, there > > was also an appropriate follow-up patch discussion started by > > Andrew. > > There was a lot of back and forth with Arnd. In the end, he gave up > arguing because too many voices did not like his solution. So my > original version stands. Yes, this appears to have been a mistake on my part. In the conversation regarding patch #2 of V2, you said you were going to work on implementing something and would report back. I applied that to the whole series instead of just to the second patch. At any rate, applied to mvebu/fixes now. > However, the patch at the end of > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/275528.html > > is useful, and it would be nice if it could be merged as well. I'll take a look. thx, Jason.