linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Erik Bosman <ebn310@few.vu.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] x86,perf: Only allow rdpmc if a perf_event is mapped
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:57:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141016155756.GE30314@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141016084227.GI7369@worktop.fdxtended.com>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> gawd I hate the static_key API.

Yahaa, I like to twist my brain for fun just by staring at
sched_clock_stable() logic.

Oh, and it needs fixing btw because if you look at the asm that comes
out, after the jump labels have run, you get an unconditional jump to
the likely code doing RDTSC.

This should be avoided and we should have the likely code be laid out
first with the NOP and have the jump labels patch in the unconditional
JMP only on the small amount of systems where we're unlikely to be using
the TSC... For that we'd need to pound on jump labels a bit more though.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-16 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-14 22:57 [RFC 0/5] CR4 handling improvements Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-14 22:57 ` [RFC 1/5] x86: Clean up cr4 manipulation Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16  8:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-16 11:18     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-16 11:29       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-16 15:32         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16 15:47           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-14 22:57 ` [RFC 2/5] x86: Store a per-cpu shadow copy of CR4 Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16  8:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-16 11:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-16 15:30     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-14 22:57 ` [RFC 3/5] x86: Add a comment clarifying LDT context switching Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16 15:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-16 16:21     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-21  5:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-21  5:44         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-21  6:05           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-14 22:57 ` [RFC 4/5] perf: Add pmu callbacks to track event mapping and unmapping Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-14 22:57 ` [RFC 5/5] x86,perf: Only allow rdpmc if a perf_event is mapped Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16  8:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-16 15:37     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-16 15:57     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-10-17  0:00   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-19 20:23     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-19 21:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-19 22:05         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-19 22:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-19 22:57             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-20  8:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-20 16:49                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-20 17:39                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-21  8:59                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-19 21:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-20  0:08       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-20  8:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-20  9:24           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-20 10:51           ` Hendrik Brueckner
2014-10-21  9:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-21 15:52               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-21  4:06 ` [RFC 0/5] CR4 handling improvements Vince Weaver
2014-10-21  4:28   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-21 15:00     ` Vince Weaver
2014-10-21 16:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-21 17:05         ` Vince Weaver
2014-10-23 11:42           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-24 12:41             ` Vince Weaver
2014-10-24 22:14               ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141016155756.GE30314@nazgul.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebn310@few.vu.nl \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).