From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753309AbaJQPlO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:41:14 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56142 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752750AbaJQPlM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:41:12 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:40:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties
 support
Message-ID: <20141017154007.GB29643@kroah.com>
References: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <11223831.j9KAEfSQsY@vostro.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11223831.j9KAEfSQsY@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we
> now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> 
> Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although
> in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor.  I have retained the Greg's
> ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been
> posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't
> do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12]
> which is substantially different.  Still, if reviewers think that their
> ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them.

No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking.

greg k-h