From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751539AbaJROtm (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:49:42 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.111]:43939 "EHLO e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbaJROtk (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:49:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:49:28 +0200 From: Dominik Dingel To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Andy Lutomirski , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Bob Liu , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , Gleb Natapov , Heiko Carstens , "H. Peter Anvin" , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Jianyu Zhan , Johannes Weiner , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Konstantin Weitz , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Zijlstra , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce new VM_NOZEROPAGE flag Message-ID: <20141018164928.2341415f@BR9TG4T3.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <54419265.9000000@intel.com> References: <1413554990-48512-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1413554990-48512-3-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54419265.9000000@intel.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14101814-0021-0000-0000-000001712557 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:04:21 -0700 Dave Hansen wrote: > Is there ever a time where the VMAs under an mm have mixed VM_NOZEROPAGE > status? Reading the patches, it _looks_ like it might be an all or > nothing thing. Currently it is an all or nothing thing, but for a future change we might want to just tag the guest memory instead of the complete user address space. > Full disclosure: I've got an x86-specific feature I want to steal a flag > for. Maybe we should just define another VM_ARCH bit. > So you think of something like: #if defined(CONFIG_S390) # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_ARCH_1 #endif #ifndef VM_NOZEROPAGE # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_NONE #endif right?