linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141020124716.465dce45@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141020160542.GG24595@windriver.com>

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:05:42 -0400
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
 
> > No. You move the items off the main list head and add it to the local
> > list and they never go back. Just start processing that local list.
> > Anything added to the main list after that will not get woken up by
> > that current wake_all call. It will need to be woken by another wake_up.
> 
> OK.  But we may not run all of the wakeups, because of:
> 
> +                       if (++woken == nr_exclusive)
> +                               break;
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > What would need to be done as an unwind at the end of processing the
> > > local list head before it disappears from existence?  Anything?
> > 
> > Not sure what you mean here.
> 
> Per above -- can't there be "orphaned" entries that only exist on the
> local list head that didn't get processed?  What happens to those?
> 

Why not just take off nr_exclusive tasks off the main list and add
those to the local list, and then wake up all on the local list?

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-20 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-18  0:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] simple wait queue support (from -rt) Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] wait.h: mark complex wait functions to prepare for simple wait Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] wait.c: " Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18 21:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-18 23:05     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-10-20 15:21       ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-20 15:40         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-10-20 16:05           ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-20 16:47             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-10-20 13:44     ` Paul Gortmaker
2015-01-14 10:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-14 14:18     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-14 14:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-14 15:01         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-14 15:29           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-18  0:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/completion: convert completions to use simple wait queues Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] simplewait: don't run a possibly infinite number of wake under raw lock Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-18  0:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] simplewait: do we make barriers reflect what was in use in -rt? Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141020124716.465dce45@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).