From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932730AbaJ3K71 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:59:27 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:56976 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758162AbaJ3K70 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:59:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:58:48 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Mike Looijmans Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20141030105848.GU18557@sirena.org.uk> References: <1414570560-10320-1-git-send-email-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> <1414570560-10320-2-git-send-email-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> <20141029123005.GH18557@sirena.org.uk> <5451DF10.7030605@topic.nl> <20141030101555.GT18557@sirena.org.uk> <5452131F.9000307@topic.nl> <545218B1.8030306@topic.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3qdiFAD7DM00q+Z9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <545218B1.8030306@topic.nl> X-Cookie: FORCE YOURSELF TO RELAX! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ltc3562 voltage regulator driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --3qdiFAD7DM00q+Z9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote: > =EF=BB=BFOn 10/30/2014 11:29 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > >So I should add "regulator-default-voltage" to the generic code? That wo= uld > >indeed be better than trying to do it into this driver. > >But would that need a separate patch for regulator core to add the prope= rty? Yes. > Hmm, I looked into doing that, but that isn't trivial, and too many devic= es > will suffer. Why would this have a negative effect on other devices? Unless somehow the other devices add the property they should not be affected by it; if users do add the property presumably that's because it's doing something useful. --3qdiFAD7DM00q+Z9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUhnnAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQutIH/RMo0S1wnX1IXdy5Zm25HTu/ HOCfSrVcIJUKEzwlZ+H5DuQ+NrLX6gbVCNKsYknK8m2PhdxlTTPMTJe6ruQ1jmvK tLonLxuUSm9pdbMPcX1apZXWiivNqsbf++3Jiltk/OI8rh0Cy1W5zUiUeD4YsGIO mihbKZMJl4AMs7/pNzuno52c81Ft/F0Jcd2WVuvJZ6O1xSMBz9yOUqVbW0miFcbk lgT8OMF+UJh3M5BQp7YBoRHEH4oar9E+THlvUNqGWangbkOTS7eF0KlslwJ3sMtg h9v59XIKucokHubpXN5fnnfXHl2hAJz8yLw+mMfQ2YBpgkKdHYuhq9W09HFtqRA= =Ojke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3qdiFAD7DM00q+Z9--