From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753772AbaKCVrV (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:47:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37649 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751865AbaKCVrR (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:47:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:47:12 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Jan Beulich , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , Sebastian Lackner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chuck Ebbert , Anish Bhatt , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] sched/x86_64: Don't save flags on context switch Message-ID: <20141103214712.GA8711@redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/03, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > And do we ever have TF set during a context switch? I hope not. I too hope. > Also, what's with 'jmp exit_intr' at the end of retint_kernel? Why > isn't that 'jmp retint_kernel'? Even better, why not "jmp retint_restore_args" ? preempt_schedule_irq() checks need_resched() and returns with irqs disabled, not need to to recheck test_preempt_need_resched() ? Oleg.