linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: guard against misaligned microcode data
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:47:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141111104700.GC31490@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141108215749.GC32023@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:57:49PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I will remove the WARN_ONCE, and place a comment in its place:
> 
> /*
>  * the memory area holding the microcode update data must be 16-byte
>  * aligned.  This is supposed to be guaranteed by kmalloc().
>  */

So this makes this comment pretty useless as it doesn't do anything
about the case where 16-byte alignment gets violated. Actually I was
expecting something else:

* you either write down *why* kmalloc guarantees alignment. From a quick
look it might but it might not, hint

#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)

* or you actually go and fix this by making sure all memory in the intel
loader is 16-byte aligned. Maybe a loader-specific kmalloc wrapper,
something which allocates a bit more and then aligns it properly, and so
on...

But simply adding a comment which doesn't do anything to solve the
situation doesn't make a lot of sense. And more importantly, doesn't
solve the situation.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-11 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-08 17:37 [PATCH 0/8] x86, microcode, intel: fixes and enhancements Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-05 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-05 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-05 21:13       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-05 21:49         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-06  5:15           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't update each HT core twice Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 13:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-20 18:24     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-28 17:31       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 18:43         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-01 11:06           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-01 19:20             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-04 15:53               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, microcode, intel: clarify log messages Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 13:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-21 14:13     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-29  9:54       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 20:08         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:37           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: add error logging to early update driver Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-20 15:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-21 14:10     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-30 17:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-30 18:15         ` Joe Perches
2014-10-31 20:10         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't check extsig entry checksum Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-10-30 20:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-31 17:14     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: use cpuid explicitly instead of sync_core Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 17:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 18:40     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 19:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: guard against misaligned microcode data Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-18  0:48   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 19:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 22:54     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 23:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-08 21:57         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-11 10:47           ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-11-11 16:57             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-11 17:13               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-11 19:54                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-12 12:31                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-13  0:18                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-13 11:53                       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-15 23:10                         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-24 17:35                           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-25 13:29                             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: defend apply_microcode_intel with BUG_ON Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 20:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-11-07 22:56     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-11-07 23:48       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141111104700.GC31490@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).