linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during cpu hotplug
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:56:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112225636.GA23249@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415809626.15631.35.camel@tkhai>

Hi Kirill,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:27:06PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>В Ср, 12/11/2014 в 09:06 +0800, Wanpeng Li пишет:
>> I observe that dl task can't be migrated to other cpus during cpu hotplug, 
>> in addition, task may/may not be running again if cpu is added back. The 
>> root cause which I found is that dl task will be throtted and removed from 
>> dl rq after comsuming all budget, which leads to stop task can't pick it up 
>> from dl rq and migrate to other cpus during hotplug.
>> 
>> The method to reproduce:
>> schedtool -E -t 50000:100000 -e ./test
>> Actually test is just a simple for loop. Then observe which cpu the test
>> task is on.
>> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online
>> 
>> This patch adds the dl task migration during cpu hotplug by finding a most 
>> suitable later deadline rq after dl timer fire if current rq is offline, 
>> if fail to find a suitable later deadline rq then fallback to any eligible 
>> online cpu in order that the deadline task will come back to us, and the 
>> push/pull mechanism should then move it around properly.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v4 -> v5:
>>  * remove raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
>>  * cleanup codes, spotted by Peterz
>>  * cleanup patch description
>> v3 -> v4:
>>  * use tsk_cpus_allowed wrapper
>>  * fix compile error
>> v2 -> v3:
>>  * don't get_task_struct
>>  * if cannot preempt any rq, fallback to pick any online cpus
>>  * use cpu_active_mask as original later_mask if cpu is offline
>> v1 -> v2:
>>  * push the task to another cpu in dl_task_timer() if rq is offline.
>> 
>>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> index f3d7776..7c31906 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static int start_dl_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, bool boosted)
>>  	return hrtimer_active(&dl_se->dl_timer);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq);
>>  /*
>>   * This is the bandwidth enforcement timer callback. If here, we know
>>   * a task is not on its dl_rq, since the fact that the timer was running
>> @@ -538,6 +539,43 @@ again:
>>  	update_rq_clock(rq);
>>  	dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
>>  	dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * So if we find that the rq the task was on is no longer
>> +	 * available, we need to select a new rq.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (unlikely(!rq->online)) {
>> +		struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
>> +
>> +		later_rq = find_lock_later_rq(p, rq);
>> +
>> +		if (!later_rq) {
>> +			int cpu;
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			 * If cannot preempt any rq, fallback to pick any
>> +			 * online cpu.
>> +			 */
>> +			cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask,
>> +					tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
>> +			if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>> +				pr_warn("fail to find any online cpu and task will never come back\n");
>> +				goto unlock;
>> +			}
>> +			later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
>later_rq is not locked here, but you activate p on it and you do unlock below.

Great catch! How about add double_lock_balance(rq, later_rq); here?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
>> +		set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu);
>> +		activate_task(later_rq, p, 0);
>
>		^^^^^
>
>> +
>> +		resched_curr(later_rq);
>> +
>> +		double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq);
>
>		^^^^^^
>
>> +
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
>>  		enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
>>  		if (dl_task(rq->curr))
>> @@ -1185,8 +1223,9 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
>>  	 * We have to consider system topology and task affinity
>>  	 * first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
>>  	 */
>> -	cpumask_copy(later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
>> -	cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> +	cpumask_copy(later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> +	if (likely(task_rq(task)->online))
>> +		cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
>>  	cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, &task->cpus_allowed);
>>  	best_cpu = cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl,
>>  			task, later_mask);
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-12 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-12  1:06 [PATCH v5] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during cpu hotplug Wanpeng Li
2014-11-12 15:08 ` Juri Lelli
2014-11-12 15:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 23:02     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-01-05 14:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06  2:14       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-12 23:22   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-18 23:18   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-19 10:13     ` Juri Lelli
2014-11-19 12:30       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-19 13:49         ` Juri Lelli
2014-11-19 23:08           ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-12 16:27 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-12 22:56   ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2014-11-13 10:10     ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-13 10:19       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-13 10:21         ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-11-16 22:59           ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-20  8:49           ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141112225636.GA23249@kernel \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).