From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"huxinwei@huawei.com" <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/16] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:48:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141118144819.GK12037@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546B041A.4060403@huawei.com>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:32:26AM +0000, Yijing Wang wrote:
>
> >> +LIST_HEAD(pci_host_bridge_list);
> >> +DECLARE_RWSEM(pci_host_bridge_sem);
> >
> > Unless the pci_host_bridge_sem is accessed thousands of times per second,
> > it's normally better to use a simple mutex instead.
>
> OK, I will use simple mutex instead.
>
> >
> >> +static struct resource busn_resource = {
> >> + .name = "PCI busn",
> >> + .start = 0,
> >> + .end = 255,
> >> + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUS,
> >> +};
> >
> > I think it would be better to require callers to pass the bus resource
> > down to the function.
>
> Hmm, I think most of caller will provide the bus resource, but some others
> will not give any bus resource, extremely, no any resources :(. But we still
> need properly configure their resources for compatibility.
>
> >
> >> +struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(
> >> + struct device *parent, u32 db,
> >> + struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> >> + struct list_head *resources)
> >> +{
> >
> > Do we still need to pass the 'sysdata' in here? If we are guaranteed to
> > have a device pointer, we should always be able to get the driver
> > private data from dev_get_drvdata(host->dev->parent).
>
> We need, some platforms pass NULL pointer as host bridge parent.
Yijing,
May I suggest a different approach here? Rather than having to pass an opaque
pointer that gets converted by the host bridge driver back to the private
structure, what about promoting a new style of usage, that is similar to the
way device drivers work? Lets try to promote the embedding of the generic
pci_host_bridge structure in the host bridge specific structure! Then we can
access the private data doing container_of().
Something like this:
struct pci_controller {
struct pci_host_bridge bridge;
/* private host bridge data here */
.....
};
#define PCI_CONTROLLER(bus) ({
struct pci_host_bridge *hb = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge); \
container_of(hb, struct pci_controller, bridge); })
Then we can retrieve the host bridge structure from everywhere we have a device.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> >
> >> + host = kzalloc(sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!host)
> >> + return NULL;
> >
> > devm_kzalloc maybe?
>
> I don't know much detail about devm_kzalloc(), but we have no pci host driver
> here, and I found no devm_kzalloc() uses in core PCI code before.
>
> >
> >> + if (!resources) {
> >> + /* Use default IO/MEM/BUS resources*/
> >> + pci_add_resource(&host->windows, &ioport_resource);
> >> + pci_add_resource(&host->windows, &iomem_resource);
> >> + pci_add_resource(&host->windows, &busn_resource);
> >> + } else {
> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources, list)
> >> + list_move_tail(&window->list, &host->windows);
> >> + }
> >
> > I think we should assume that the correct resources are passed. You
> > could add a wrapper around this function to convert old platforms
> > though.
>
> OK, I will move these code out of pci_create_host_bridge, and add a wrapper
> to setup the default resources.
>
> >
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_create_host_bridge);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() maybe?
>
> OK, will update it.
>
> >
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> >> index 8b11b38..daa7f40 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> >> @@ -402,7 +402,12 @@ struct pci_host_bridge_window {
> >> struct pci_host_bridge {
> >> struct device dev;
> >> struct pci_bus *bus; /* root bus */
> >> + struct list_head list;
> >> struct list_head windows; /* pci_host_bridge_windows */
> >> + int busnum;
> >
> > The busnum should already be implied through the bus resource.
>
> Yes, I will consider remove it and introduce a helper function to get the root bus number, thanks!
>
> Thanks!
> Yijing.
>
> >
> > Arnd
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
> Yijing
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-17 10:21 [RFC PATCH 00/16] Refine PCI host bridge scan interfaces Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] PCI: Enhance pci_scan_root_bus() to support default IO/MEM resources Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 7:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 11:46 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 14:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-19 1:15 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] PCI: Use pci_scan_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 14:28 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-19 1:19 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] PCI: Rip out pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 14:34 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-19 1:21 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] PCI: Use pci_scan_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus_parented() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] PCI: Use u32 type to combine PCI domain and bus number Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] PCI: Separate pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 8:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 9:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 11:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 12:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 12:41 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 14:48 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2014-11-19 2:24 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-19 16:29 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-20 2:00 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 15:30 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-19 1:42 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-19 16:37 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-20 2:47 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-20 9:47 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-21 2:53 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-21 9:53 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] PCI: Introduce pci_scan_host_bridge() and pci_host_info Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 15:42 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-19 2:09 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-19 16:41 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-20 2:54 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] PCI: Associate .get_msi_ctrl() with pci_host_bridge Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 15:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] PCI: Add of_scan_bus() to pci_host_info Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] x86/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() instead of pci_create_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] ia64/PCI: Remove the redundant bus variable Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] ia64/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() to refactor pci_acpi_scan_root() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] arm/PCI: Introduce pci_get_domain_nr() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 12:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-18 0:55 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] arm/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() instead of pci_scan_root_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] powerpc/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan PCI bus Yijing Wang
2014-11-17 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] Refine PCI host bridge scan interfaces Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 11:17 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 11:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-18 11:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-18 12:14 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 12:17 ` Yijing Wang
2014-11-18 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-20 12:01 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-11-20 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-20 11:54 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-11-20 12:08 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-20 12:53 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-11-20 16:39 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-21 2:58 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141118144819.GK12037@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liviu@dudau.co.uk \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).