From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754658AbaKRW3l (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:29:41 -0500 Received: from relay.variantweb.net ([104.131.199.242]:53857 "EHLO relay.variantweb.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754199AbaKRW3j (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:29:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:36 -0600 From: Seth Jennings To: Weijie Yang Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Dan Streetman'" , "'Minchan Kim'" , "'Bob Liu'" , xfishcoder@gmail.com, "'Weijie Yang'" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: frontswap: invalidate expired data on a dup-store failure Message-ID: <20141118222936.GB20945@cerebellum.variantweb.net> References: <000001d0030d$0505aaa0$0f10ffe0$%yang@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001d0030d$0505aaa0$0f10ffe0$%yang@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:51:36PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote: > If a frontswap dup-store failed, it should invalidate the expired page > in the backend, or it could trigger some data corruption issue. > Such as: > 1. use zswap as the frontswap backend with writeback feature > 2. store a swap page(version_1) to entry A, success > 3. dup-store a newer page(version_2) to the same entry A, fail > 4. use __swap_writepage() write version_2 page to swapfile, success > 5. zswap do shrink, writeback version_1 page to swapfile > 6. version_2 page is overwrited by version_1, data corrupt. Good catch! > > This patch fixes this issue by invalidating expired data immediately > when meet a dup-store failure. > > Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang > --- > mm/frontswap.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c > index c30eec5..f2a3571 100644 > --- a/mm/frontswap.c > +++ b/mm/frontswap.c > @@ -244,8 +244,10 @@ int __frontswap_store(struct page *page) > the (older) page from frontswap > */ > inc_frontswap_failed_stores(); > - if (dup) > + if (dup) { > __frontswap_clear(sis, offset); > + frontswap_ops->invalidate_page(type, offset); Looking at __frontswap_invalidate_page(), should we do inc_frontswap_invalidates() too? If so, maybe we should just call __frontswap_invalidate_page(). Thanks, Seth > + } > } > if (frontswap_writethrough_enabled) > /* report failure so swap also writes to swap device */ > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org