On Saturday 27 December 2014 15:13:28 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote: > On Thursday 25 December 2014 22:54:34 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote: > > On Thursday 18 December 2014 12:08:58 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Wednesday 10 December 2014 14:32:16 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 10 December 2014 12:51:30 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 09 December 2014 21:07:01 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > Now we have autodetection code for fan multiplier > > > > > > and maximal fan speed so we do not need to have > > > > > > those constants for each laptop in kernel driver > > > > > > code. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár > > > > > > --- > > > > > > !!!Please do not apply this patch until all affected > > > > > > machines will be tested!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > I tested autodetection code only on Dell Latitude > > > > > > E6440 (where it worked). Other machines which needs > > > > > > to be tested: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dell Latitude D520 > > > > > > Dell Latitude E6540 > > > > > > Dell Precision WorkStation 490 > > > > > > Dell Studio > > > > > > Dell XPS M140 (MXC051) > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Can somebody else with dell laptops test this patch > > > > > series? > > > > > > > > i8k_get_fan_nominal_rpm() returns -22 on my XPS13, so > > > > nothing changed with this patch series applied. > > > > > > > > Gabriele > > > > > > So your BIOS cannot report nominal_rpm and because your > > > machine is not in dmi list, all 3 patches do nothing for > > > your machine. > > > > > > But you need to set multiplier to 1, right? > > > > > > What about this patch? (on top of 3/3) > > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/i8k.c > > > +++ b/drivers/char/i8k.c > > > @@ -850,6 +850,10 @@ static int __init i8k_probe(void) > > > > > > */ > > > > > > for (fan = 0; fan < I8K_FAN_COUNT; ++fan) { > > > > > > i8k_fan_mult[fan] = I8K_FAN_DEFAULT_MULT; > > > > > > + if (i8k_get_fan_rpm(fan) > I8K_FAN_MAX_RPM) { > > > + i8k_fan_mult[fan] = 1; > > > + continue; > > > + } > > > > > > for (val = 0; val < 256; ++val) { > > > > > > ret = i8k_get_fan_nominal_rpm(fan, val); > > > if (ret > I8K_FAN_MAX_RPM) { > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sorry for replying only now, but I couldn't follow this > > thread closely and I'm a bit lost now. I haven't tested the > > suggested change, but I don't think it would work in a > > reliable way. It's not rare for the fan to be completely > > stopped, especially on boot. You are right though, 1 is the > > right multiplier. > > I took a better look at the code and my laptop is indeed able > to report the nominal speed. The problem with the original > patch was that the first call of i8k_get_fan_nominal_rpm() > correctly returned -22 (the fan doesn't exist) and the loop > was terminated because of that. I tested the following patch > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1892101.html and the > fan multiplier auto detection worked. > > I confirm that the suggested change in case the nominal speed > can't be retrieved is not OK as its outcome depends on the > current state of the fans. > > > Guenter, while I was trying to catch up, I noticed that the > > support for the XPS 13 [1] will be added. May I ask you > > which revision of the laptop was tested? I own the 9333 one > > and I'm not sure that having i8k automatically loaded is a > > good idea. The reason is that reading and setting the speed > > of the right (and only) fan causes a freeze of the laptop > > of some milliseconds, enough to be annoying and noticeable. > > I'm worried of the effect this might have in the everyday > > use, users might start noticing random freezes because of > > one application that all the sudden is able to read the > > speed of the fan. I don't if the same happens on all the > > other Dell systems, this is the first and only Dell laptop > > I owned. > > > > If the tested laptop wasn't the XPS13 9333 and this problem > > does not exists, would it be possible to make the > > DMI_PRODUCT_NAME string such that it matches only the > > tested revision? The string that identifies my laptop is > > "XPS13 9333". > > > > Gabriele > > > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1878801.html > > I modified i8k so that it prints the time required to execute > the assembly code in i8k_smm(). Here what I got: > > [ 4697.485130] i8k_smm asm: 1965800 ns #pwm1 > [ 4697.487383] i8k_smm asm: 1375057 ns #temp3_input > [ 4697.489477] i8k_smm asm: 1112493 ns #temp3_label > [ 4697.991687] i8k_smm asm: 500796086 ns #fan1_input > [ 4697.998245] i8k_smm asm: 1957365 ns #fan1_label > [ 4698.009190] i8k_smm asm: 1770247 ns #temp1_input > [ 4698.014416] i8k_smm asm: 749734 ns #temp1_label > [ 4698.019103] i8k_smm asm: 2503962 ns #temp2_input > [ 4698.023490] i8k_smm asm: 1738982 ns #temp2_label > > As you can see, the time required to read the speed of the fan > is substantially higher than the combined time of all the > other reads. > > Is the difference so big for the other systems that have been > tested? It looks like we should not read fan rpm at startup for multiplier autodetection... and only fan nominal speed. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com