From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755681AbbAGXf7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:35:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:47053 "EHLO mail-qc0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751991AbbAGXf5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:35:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:35:53 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Richard Weinberger , Linux API , Linux Containers , Serge Hallyn , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Lutomirski , cgroups mailinglist , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 8/8] cgroup: Add documentation for cgroup namespaces Message-ID: <20150107233553.GC28630@htj.dyndns.org> References: <54ACFC38.5070007@nod.at> <87fvbmir9q.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107193059.GA1857@mail.hallyn.com> <87bnma6xwv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107224430.GA28414@htj.dyndns.org> <878uhe42km.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107230615.GA28630@htj.dyndns.org> <87fvbm2nni.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87y4peyxw5.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y4peyxw5.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:27:38PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> The -o SUBSYS option doesn't exist. Jesus, at least get yourself > >> familiar with the basics before claiming random stuff. > > Oh let's see I got that command line option out of /proc/mounts and yes > it works. Perhaps it doesn't if I invoke unified hiearchies but the > option does in fact exist and work. I meant the -o SUBSYS doesn't exist for unified hierarchy. > Now I really do need to test report regressions, and send probably send > regression fixes. If I understand your strange ranting I think you just > told me that option that -o SUBSYS does work with unified hierarchies. What? Why would -O SUBSYS exist for unified hierarchy? It's unified for all controllers. > Tejun. I asked you specifically about this case 2 years ago at plumbers > and you personally told me this would continue to work. I am going to > hold you to that. I have no idea what you're talking about in *THIS* thread. I'm fully aware of what was discussed *THEN*. > Fixing bugs is one thing. Gratuitious regressions that make supporting > existing user space applications insane is another. Can you explain what problem you're actually trying to talk about without spouting random claims about regressions? -- tejun