From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752118AbbATXB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:01:59 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:50222 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479AbbATXB6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:01:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:01:50 -0800 From: josh@joshtriplett.org To: Kim Phillips Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , Joonsoo Kim , Rik van Riel , Sasha Levin , Al Viro , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Jens Axboe , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: fix undefined reference to `.kernel_map_pages' on PPC builds Message-ID: <20150120230150.GA14475@cloud> References: <20150120140200.aa7ba0eb28d95e456972e178@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150120140200.aa7ba0eb28d95e456972e178@freescale.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:02:00PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote: > It's possible to configure DEBUG_PAGEALLOC without PAGE_POISONING on > ppc. Fix building the generic kernel_map_pages() implementation in > this case: > > LD init/built-in.o > mm/built-in.o: In function `free_pages_prepare': > mm/page_alloc.c:770: undefined reference to `.kernel_map_pages' > mm/built-in.o: In function `prep_new_page': > mm/page_alloc.c:933: undefined reference to `.kernel_map_pages' > mm/built-in.o: In function `map_pages': > mm/compaction.c:61: undefined reference to `.kernel_map_pages' > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips > --- > mm/Makefile | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile > index 4bf586e..2956467 100644 > --- a/mm/Makefile > +++ b/mm/Makefile > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SLOB) += slob.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) += mmu_notifier.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KSM) += ksm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING) += debug-pagealloc.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) += debug-pagealloc.o Does it work correctly to list the same object file twice? Doesn't seem like it would. Shouldn't this do something like the following instead: ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)$(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING),) obj-y += debug-pagealloc.o endif ? > obj-$(CONFIG_SLAB) += slab.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SLUB) += slub.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK) += kmemcheck.o > -- > 2.2.2 >