From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933072AbbA0MsX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:48:23 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38274 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932490AbbA0MsT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:48:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:48:15 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Xunlei Pang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/deadline: Fix wrong cpudl_find() in check_preempt_equal_dl() Message-ID: <20150127124815.GC21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1421642980-10045-1-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org> <1421642980-10045-3-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1421642980-10045-3-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:49:38AM +0000, Xunlei Pang wrote: > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > @@ -943,14 +943,23 @@ out: > return cpu; > } > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask_dl); > + > static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) > { > + struct cpumask *later_mask = > + this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl); > + > + /* Make sure the mask is initialized first */ > + if (unlikely(!later_mask)) > + return; > + > /* > * Current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule, > * let's hope p can move out. > */ > if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 || > - cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, NULL) == -1) > + cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->curr, later_mask) == -1) > return; > > /* But but, should you not put something in that mask before you use it?