From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753619AbbA2BZ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:25:58 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38409 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752162AbbA2BZy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:25:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:06:32 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Charles Keepax Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Liam Girdwood , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <20150128110632.GR21293@sirena.org.uk> References: <20150128130047.2311c637@canb.auug.org.au> <20150128090935.GH14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20150128095040.GI14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="79RLYUToM/4jl2vV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150128095040.GI14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Cookie: My LESLIE GORE record is BROKEN ... User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --79RLYUToM/4jl2vV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:50:40AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:09:35AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Very sorry guys my fault, not sure how that slipped through. Mark > > do you want an incremental fix or shall I respin the two patches > > in question? > Ah... ok I think I just timed my patch very badly in relation to > Lar's changes and it was building here so I failed to notice the > error. I see you have fixed it in the merge are you happy to go > with that solution? It should be fixed for tomorrow I think - the zero day tester was quite slow for some reason. --79RLYUToM/4jl2vV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUyMK3AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQTtwH+wesOWVOVHHRceeFmLExpWv+ 5wGu9zwonNJ0CaTfWNSrs8MwV+7o4qa/sQWYThJuJAg4XS6VtvtMiVyuPsvymRRO fJGvJph49n63VNm0WKLHWNRwAThLZU9rQldGdQPWNqs/v2bCbaseqpa10AsNEiZN eX3N8cXH5uuWlvXGOVgmiKY7S+uahbjY0mXFYdytpAqtto+v2oMVHYk3w8rS1OhF EdUuzVhsWaUxVL2yDsKf1wwI8Fea5ilNYRYRyAjXtj/1IreMq/9P9mdgthDPHSrz jD7NkK/Kr2N4CMRSqLe6RZl0De52jofGf1NFALJlAZbPepbZvbQN0/27psfj/Hs= =ozMb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --79RLYUToM/4jl2vV--