linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_request
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:56:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128145651.GB965@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422432945-6764-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>

On (01/28/15 17:15), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Admin could reset zram during I/O operation going on so we have
> used zram->init_lock as read-side lock in I/O path to prevent
> sudden zram meta freeing.
> 
> However, the init_lock is really troublesome.
> We can't do call zram_meta_alloc under init_lock due to lockdep splat
> because zram_rw_page is one of the function under reclaim path and
> hold it as read_lock while other places in process context hold it
> as write_lock. So, we have used allocation out of the lock to avoid
> lockdep warn but it's not good for readability and fainally, I met
> another lockdep splat between init_lock and cpu_hotpulug from
> kmem_cache_destroy during wokring zsmalloc compaction. :(
> 
> Yes, the ideal is to remove horrible init_lock of zram in rw path.
> This patch removes it in rw path and instead, put init_done bool
> variable to check initialization done with smp_[wmb|rmb] and
> srcu_[un]read_lock to prevent sudden zram meta freeing
> during I/O operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  5 +++
>  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index a598ada817f0..b33add453027 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/srcu.h>
>  
>  #include "zram_drv.h"
>  
> @@ -53,9 +54,31 @@ static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d,		\
>  }									\
>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
>  
> -static inline int init_done(struct zram *zram)
> +static inline bool init_done(struct zram *zram)
>  {
> -	return zram->meta != NULL;
> +	/*
> +	 * init_done can be used without holding zram->init_lock in
> +	 * read/write handler(ie, zram_make_request) but we should make sure
> +	 * that zram->init_done should set up after meta initialization is
> +	 * done. Look at setup_init_done.
> +	 */
> +	bool ret = zram->init_done;

I don't like re-introduced ->init_done.
another idea... how about using `zram->disksize == 0' instead of
`->init_done' (previously `->meta != NULL')? should do the trick.


and I'm not sure I get this rmb...

	-ss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-28 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1422432945-6764-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
2015-01-28 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] zram: free meta table in zram_meta_free Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-28 23:17   ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-29  1:49     ` Ganesh Mahendran
     [not found] ` <1422432945-6764-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
2015-01-28 14:56   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2015-01-28 15:04     ` [PATCH v1 2/2] zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_request Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-28 23:33     ` Minchan Kim
     [not found]       ` <CAHqPoqKZFDSjO1pL+ixYe_m_L0nGNcu04qSNp-jd1fUixKtHnw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-29  2:01         ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-29  2:22           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-29  5:28             ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-29  6:06               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-29  6:35                 ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-29  7:08                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-30 14:41                     ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-31 11:31                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-01 14:50                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-01 15:04                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  1:43                           ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  1:59                             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  2:45                               ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  3:47                                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  1:30                         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  1:48                           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  2:44                             ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  4:01                               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  4:28                                 ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  5:09                                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  5:18                                     ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  5:28                                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  5:10                                   ` Minchan Kim
2015-01-30  0:20                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-29 13:48   ` Ganesh Mahendran
2015-01-29 15:12     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-30  7:52       ` Ganesh Mahendran
2015-01-30  8:08         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-31  8:50           ` Ganesh Mahendran
2015-01-31 11:07             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-01-31 12:59               ` Ganesh Mahendran
2015-02-02  3:41 Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  5:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-02  6:18   ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-02  7:06     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-03  1:54       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-02-03  3:02         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-03  3:56           ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150128145651.GB965@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=opensource.ganesh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).