From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753764AbbBASMl (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:12:41 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42741 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753683AbbBASMh (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:12:37 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:12:36 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree" Message-ID: <20150201181236.GA12503@kroah.com> References: <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54CE659D.5010607@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CE659D.5010607@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 06:42:53PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:28:33 +0100 > > The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c > index 9cab54b..ac901e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int gdm_wimax_close(struct net_device *dev) > > static void kdelete(void **buf) > { > - if (buf && *buf) { > + if (buf) { > kfree(*buf); > *buf = NULL; > } Instead we should delete this function and have the driver use the "correct" kfree calls instead, right? That extra setting the buffer to NULL is a waste for most of these calls. thanks, greg k-h