From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754844AbbBBLiM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 06:38:12 -0500
Received: from mta-out1.inet.fi ([62.71.2.203]:58622 "EHLO jenni2.inet.fi"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751148AbbBBLiI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 06:38:08 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:37:40 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 17/19] x86: expose number of page table levels on
 Kconfig level
Message-ID: <20150202113740.GA11802@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
References: <1422629008-13689-18-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <1422664208-220779-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <1422876393.19005.21.camel@x220>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1422876393.19005.21.camel@x220>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 02:30 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We would want to use number of page table level to define mm_struct.
> > Let's expose it as CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> > ---
> >  v2: s/PAGETABLE_LEVELS/CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS/ include/trace/events/xen.h
> 
> Isn't there some (informal) rule to update an entire series to a next
> version (and not only the patches that were changed in that version)?

It's up to maintainer. I can do any way. Last time I've asked, Andrew was
okay with v2 on individual patches.

> Anyhow, it seems you sent a v2 for 05/19, 11/19 and 17/19 only. Is that
> correct?

Correct. Plus one patch to fix build on all !MMU configurations.

I've also updated the git tree.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov