From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Add a bit of paranoia
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204163336.GC5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150204145136.GB31111@krava.brq.redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > That looks like tail recursive fun! An irq work that raises and irq work
> > > ad infinitum. Lemme see if I can squash that.. didn't we have something
> > > like this before... /me goes look.
> >
> >
> > Does this make it go away?
> >
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -4413,6 +4413,8 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct ir
> > struct perf_event *event = container_of(entry,
> > struct perf_event, pending);
> >
> > + int rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
> > +
>
> hum, you should check the rctx
>
> if (rctx == -1)
> return;
D'uh, yes.
> also this recursion is bound to swevent_htable, should we rather add
> separate ctx data for irq_work to limit the clashing with SW events?
No, we explicitly want to disable software events while handling the
irq_work. The problem as reported looks like irq_work triggering a
swevent (tp actually, but that's classed the same) generates a new
irq_work, and we get stuck in an endless cycle of that.
So by effectively disabling swevents while processing the irq_work we
should break the cycle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 12:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] perf fixes Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 12:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] perf: Tighten (and fix) the grouping condition Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 15:02 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-23 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 15:22 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-04 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-28 14:30 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 12:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Add a bit of paranoia Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-26 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-27 21:28 ` Vince Weaver
2015-01-29 2:16 ` Vince Weaver
2015-01-29 7:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-29 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-04 14:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Fix put_event() ctx lock tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-29 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Add a bit of paranoia Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-02 6:33 ` Vince Weaver
2015-02-02 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-02 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-04 14:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-02-04 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-02-04 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-04 14:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Fix move_group() order tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2015-02-04 14:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Add a bit of paranoia tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 12:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] perf: Fix event->ctx locking Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-04 14:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-26 14:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] perf fixes Vince Weaver
2015-01-26 18:03 ` Vince Weaver
2015-01-26 18:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-26 18:52 ` Vince Weaver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150204163336.GC5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).