Re: [PATCH 0/6] PM / sleep: Support for quiescing timers during suspend-to-idle

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PM / sleep: Support for quiescing timers during suspend-to-idle
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:13:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150213081342.GM2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8292243.ibkmfVtXac@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:00:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series adds support for quiescing timers during the last state of
> suspend-to-idle transitions.
> 
> Patches [1-4/6] together are functionally equivalent to the combo RFC patch
> I sent last time (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142344909201464&w=4).
> 
> Patches [5-6/6] add ->enter_freeze callback implementations to intel_idle
> and the ACPI cpuidle driver.
> 
> [1/6] - Rework the suspend-to-idle "mechanics" in preparation for the subsequent
>         changes.  The existing functionality should not change after this.
> [2/6] - Modify update_fast_timekeeper() to take struct tk_read_base pointers as
>         arguments.
> [3/6] - Make it safe to use the fast timekeeper while suspended.
> [4/6] - Support for quiescing timers during suspend-to-idle (core part).
> [5/6] - ->enter_freeze callback for intel_idle.
> [6/6] - ->enter_freeze callback for ACPI cpuidle.
> 
> This works as expected on everything I have in my office and can readily test.
> 
> The patches should apply without any problems on top of the current Linus' tree.

Thanks for the updates, looks good to me.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>