From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755078AbbB0IWW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:22:22 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:33795 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754771AbbB0IWU (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:22:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:22:16 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Kerrisk , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: report pid reservation failure properly Message-ID: <20150227082216.GB30001@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20150204102719.GB29434@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1423046628-23638-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20150223201701.GA28639@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20150226144908.5e3d354d7b24174e90089721@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150226144908.5e3d354d7b24174e90089721@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 26-02-15 14:49:08, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:17:01 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > ping on this one? Should I just resend (your way Andrew)? Or are there > > any objections to the patch as is. > > Were Eric's concerns all addressed? I hope so. I didn't touch pid namespace parts and they return ENOMEM as before. > Oleg: wake up ;) > > Overall it looks like a pretty minor issue? I believe so. It should help deubugging when pid space is exhausted because getting ENOMEM under that situation is really awkward and the real reason for failure is hard to find out. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs