From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753337AbbCIUCD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:02:03 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54238 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751664AbbCIUB7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:01:59 -0400
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 21:00:35 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Junjie Mao <eternal.n08@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size
Message-ID: <20150309200035.GK12732@pd.tnic>
References: <1425766041-6551-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
 <1425766041-6551-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
 <20150309124935.GA12732@pd.tnic>
 <CAE9FiQWc+mnepaqr8RvRXkyhyaOY_C=KvE_A0Ojf_jda3KmFBA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWc+mnepaqr8RvRXkyhyaOY_C=KvE_A0Ojf_jda3KmFBA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:35:25PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Can you put back:
> "
> So need to make sure [z_extra_offset, init_size) will fit ZO, that means
> init_size need to be adjusted according to ZO size.
> That make init_size is always >= run_size.

Why?

We don't adjust init_size. We assign INIT_SIZE to it. Or do you want to
say that we indirectly adjust init_size through INIT_SIZE?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--