From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752949AbbCNKA7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:00:59 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43080 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750848AbbCNKAz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:00:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:59:23 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Junjie Mao <eternal.n08@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size
Message-ID: <20150314095923.GA3114@pd.tnic>
References: <1425766041-6551-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
 <1425766041-6551-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
 <20150313122756.GA28855@gmail.com>
 <CAE9FiQXaRmJFdEUhyn2q0v=9ymdbqZWEo1pzo6iyaNupWEp5Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150314075357.GA8319@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150314075357.GA8319@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 08:53:57AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You are still talking only about the low level code and about low
> level symptoms, while in contrast to that the primary question with...

<snip text which will be ignored again, unfortunately>

Thanks for doing that!

I really doubt it'll bring anything this time either but I don't care -
certainly I've wasted enough time trying to improve things as far as I
can so hell yeah, this bullshit has to stop!

In addition to what you've said, I have only one proposal: we revert
the whole crap and do it again, this time nice and clean in tip. It'll
stay there as long as it has to. No half-arsed commit messages, no
misunderstood crap, no lala code f*ckery. Whatever it takes, as long as
it takes.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--