From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753256AbbCPM00 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:26:26 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40748 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbbCPM0W (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:26:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:26:17 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Leonid V. Fedorenchik" Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Mike Christie , "Martin K. Petersen" , Jens Axboe , Hannes Reinecke , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Remove mentioning of block barriers Message-ID: <20150316122617.GB32460@lst.de> References: <1426280002-11940-1-git-send-email-leonidsbox@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1426280002-11940-1-git-send-email-leonidsbox@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:53:22PM +0300, Leonid V. Fedorenchik wrote: > Remove mentioning of block barriers since they were removed. > > Signed-off-by: Leonid V. Fedorenchik Looks good. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Re Jans comments: this document is structurally out of date, as it's framed aroudn the transition of the 2.4 to 2.5 block layer code. Replacing it with something that just describes the current code would be nice, nut not something I would want to bureden on someone just removing the now incorrect parts of it. And with blk-mq this is even more out of date now..