From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932924AbbCQQ3i (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:29:38 -0400 Received: from ec2-54-201-57-178.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([54.201.57.178]:45974 "EHLO ip-172-31-12-36.us-west-2.compute.internal" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754711AbbCQQ3e (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:29:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:18:55 +0000 From: dwalker@fifo99.com To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown , Bryan Huntsman , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S . Miller" , Ulf Hansson , Chris Ball , Alan Stern , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Remove mach-msm and associated code Message-ID: <20150317161855.GA14895@fifo99.com> References: <1426270185-19510-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <3936339.LqGDoxnsbi@wuerfel> <55034C70.4000403@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55034C70.4000403@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:45:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/13/15 12:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 13 March 2015 11:09:33 Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> The maintainers for mach-msm no longer have any plans to support > >> or test the platforms supported by this architecture[1]. Most likely > >> there aren't any active users of this code anyway, so let's > >> delete it and the associated drivers/code. We should probably merge > >> this as one big series through arm-soc. Although some patches > >> should be fine to take through maintainers, some things like > >> mmc and usb have header file dependencies for platform_data. > >> > >> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150307031212.GA8434@fifo99.com > >> > > As I wrote, I'd have a mild preference for doing the multiplatform > > conversion first and then removing the support in the following merge > > window, just in case someone wants that code back. > > > > If everyone wants to see that code die rather sooner than later, > > that's fine with me as well. > > I think everyone wants to see the code die now. They can always pull the > multi-platform patches from the list. I'll stash away my 7200 DT > conversion in case someone cares but I really doubt anybody does. I would say I want it to die , but it seems like you do .. It's fine with me tho .. Daniel