From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756024AbbCRTFX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:05:23 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35105 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755319AbbCRTFO (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:05:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:05:09 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Hanjun Guo Cc: Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , "jcm@redhat.com" , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Robert Richter , Timur Tabi , Ashwin Chaugule , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Message-ID: <20150318190509.GM10863@arm.com> References: <1426077587-1561-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1426077587-1561-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hanjun, On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: > This patch set already tested on multi platforms: > - AMD Seattle board; > - Cavium Thunder board; > - Huawei D02 board; > - Qualcomm ARM64 platform > > This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and > Reviewed-bys for v9: > > - new Acks from Rafael, Olof, Grant, Lorenzo > - new way to handle typdef phys_cpuid_t which suggested by Rafael, > but no functional change > - Remove if(!phys) for early ioremappings > - Rework sleep function for ARM64 > - Introduce linux/acpi_irq.h to hold acpi_irq_init() > - Disable ACPI if not HW_REDUCED_ACPI compliant > - Remove the doc of why ACPI on ARM So I've had a look at the current state of this series and I think there are a few immediate things left to do: (1) Resolve the acpi=force cmdline issue highlighted by Lorenzo and Catalin (2) I believe Sudeep and Lorenzo have concerns about patch 13 (SMP init), so I'm assuming there will be additional patches from them that are required. (3) I have an open comment about moving the IRQ domain code into the core, which I'd like to see addressed. (4) We need an ack from Daniel on the arch-timer patch If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcomes of next week before setting anything in stone. Also, there's no need to repost patches if you're just adding Acks. I think I'm up to speed with those on my local branch and the Tested-by party is starting to look a little silly. Will