On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:06:14AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> drivers/pwm/pwm-stmpe.c:99:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >>
> >>  Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >>
> >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>  pwm-stmpe.c |    1 -
> >>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Erm... this driver doesn't exist in my tree. What's going on?
> 
> What's going on is that the 0day build robot builds everything it
> finds, including experimental branches.
> 
> I dunno why it's mailing you though, probably I already added your
> CC on the patch... stupid me. A bit much to think of.

I guess the robot generates this patch and then runs get_maintainers.pl
on it, so it's doing the right thing. Anyway, I'll know to ignore these
in the future if drivers aren't in my tree yet.

Thierry