From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752733AbbCXKns (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:43:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:35736 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752394AbbCXKnp (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:43:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:43:41 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Linus Walleij Cc: kbuild test robot , "kbuild-all@01.org" , "linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Message-ID: <20150324104339.GG18115@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <201501160912.S502Nlmz%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20150116010614.GA27751@waimea> <20150311110425.GF22149@ulmo.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nqkreNcslJAfgyzk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:06:14AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > >> drivers/pwm/pwm-stmpe.c:99:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core w= ill do it. > >> > >> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically > >> > >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > >> --- > >> > >> pwm-stmpe.c | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > Erm... this driver doesn't exist in my tree. What's going on? >=20 > What's going on is that the 0day build robot builds everything it > finds, including experimental branches. >=20 > I dunno why it's mailing you though, probably I already added your > CC on the patch... stupid me. A bit much to think of. I guess the robot generates this patch and then runs get_maintainers.pl on it, so it's doing the right thing. Anyway, I'll know to ignore these in the future if drivers aren't in my tree yet. Thierry --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVET/bAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhT0MP/26DhxfrMMB9qqLZRxug/HFb qmhSgyeSQszIyCoHBQiez1jSIm3k84m0n0awc0v6AvyjOz4xwmNlupiHzg0l3rJV 3qbEon12Luv4L/0Z+CtzfJ0Rsl0Eui+mGuaAUi2xK3FnWJG2Uh/LBy6eDuED6FUR +ciUCbn9tav34fir3Tm1a3WbDOlvOtDVAPJiwc9Aik9L6N5xVkBIoYv0pHZ2T1H2 NO5xZDunUf/hFkb2UIBC3o5qaeaQHlG11uUl0GFiVKr/vj5EiAdhOqQfdg3ep/J2 QnhTYZivXAJXfqQlqoaM2QJ++PEkBvaDebA5/RKZISXDn+h6fIUVS53PwH7W49kl LEJG94YaWxpUTTvmQR690HCtz2lioTMeX5CfIUO8EavHPzw6QdjWYnjspi5DUkb1 mc47BOcOaaQ4HXfdprMlLpk/QGDppORPQkjpHrRwjtqdG8/GHJqW9tMDc/qR/fdE SavBLRhQzCbIwsPqxkdzU37bNPLQeUmnJjvsyO562wA77wqED24lo6uXxMYK+jr+ wJoFs13tOD4yorbXkZc79OY58fJ/3qD57aXicN36J2WO/FnMt3Gbejo4wHQbV2ex NGC+ArIGdOUmh8NYLI/A/mj8Cgwn68FouBcSb69wQ2nS3loBoV7YdduAEtvwiF2c iO6LimdPF4l0TdjcUSLH =tlUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk--