From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752977AbbCYB45 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:56:57 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:13218 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752761AbbCYB4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:56:53 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,462,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="670135785" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:56:50 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Thierry Reding Cc: Linus Walleij , "kbuild-all@01.org" , "linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Message-ID: <20150325015650.GA3200@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <201501160912.S502Nlmz%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20150116010614.GA27751@waimea> <20150311110425.GF22149@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20150324104339.GG18115@ulmo.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150324104339.GG18115@ulmo.nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:43:41AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Reding > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:06:14AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > >> drivers/pwm/pwm-stmpe.c:99:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. > > >> > > >> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically > > >> > > >> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > >> --- > > >> > > >> pwm-stmpe.c | 1 - > > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Erm... this driver doesn't exist in my tree. What's going on? > > > > What's going on is that the 0day build robot builds everything it > > finds, including experimental branches. > > > > I dunno why it's mailing you though, probably I already added your > > CC on the patch... stupid me. A bit much to think of. > > I guess the robot generates this patch and then runs get_maintainers.pl > on it, so it's doing the right thing. Anyway, I'll know to ignore these > in the future if drivers aren't in my tree yet. Sorry I've added some heuristics to avoid adding CC from get_maintainers.pl for the likely private branches. It should reduce such confusions and noises considerably in future. Thanks, Fengguang