linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	dev@codyps.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf/powerpc: Implement group_read() txn interface for 24x7 counters
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:57:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326055705.GA5593@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150317065733.GN2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Peter Zijlstra [peterz@infradead.org] wrote:
| 
| Is there a down-side to always doing the txn based group read? If an
| arch does not implement the read txn support it'll fall back to doing
| independent read ops, but we end up doing those anyway.
| 
| That way we get less special case code.

We could, but would need to move the perf_event_read() earlier in
the perf_event_read_group(). Can we do something like this (it
could be broken into two patches, but merging for easier review)
Would something liks this work?

----

perf_event_read_value() is mostly computing event count, enabled
and running times. Move the perf_event_read() into caller and
rename perf_event_read_value() to perf_event_compute_values().

Then, in perf_event_read_group(), read the event counts using the
transaction interface for all PMUs.


----
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 8e6b7d8..5896cb1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -144,9 +144,11 @@ static u64 read_pmc(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 
 	counter = pmc->counter;
 
-	if (pmc->perf_event)
-		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event,
+	if (pmc->perf_event) {
+		perf_event_read(pmc->perf_event);
+		counter += perf_event_compute_values(pmc->perf_event,
 						 &enabled, &running);
+	}
 
 	/* FIXME: Scaling needed? */
 
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index c8fe60e..1e30560 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
 				void *context);
 extern void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu,
 				int src_cpu, int dst_cpu);
-extern u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event,
+extern u64 perf_event_compute_values(struct perf_event *event,
 				 u64 *enabled, u64 *running);
 
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index a6abcd3..f7e4705 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3643,7 +3643,27 @@ static void orphans_remove_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	put_ctx(ctx);
 }
 
-u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event, u64 *enabled, u64 *running)
+static int perf_event_read_values(struct perf_event *leader)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct perf_event *sub;
+	struct pmu *pmu;
+
+	pmu = leader->pmu;
+
+	pmu->start_txn(pmu, PERF_PMU_TXN_READ);
+
+	pmu->read(leader);
+	list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry)
+		pmu->read(sub);
+
+	ret = pmu->commit_txn(pmu, PERF_PMU_TXN_READ);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+u64 perf_event_compute_values(struct perf_event *event, u64 *enabled,
+				u64 *running)
 {
 	struct perf_event *child;
 	u64 total = 0;
@@ -3653,7 +3673,6 @@ u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event, u64 *enabled, u64 *running)
 
 	mutex_lock(&event->child_mutex);
 
-	perf_event_read(event);
 	total += perf_event_count(event);
 
 	*enabled += event->total_time_enabled +
@@ -3671,7 +3690,7 @@ u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event, u64 *enabled, u64 *running)
 
 	return total;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_read_value);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_compute_values);
 
 static int perf_event_read_group(struct perf_event *event,
 				   u64 read_format, char __user *buf)
@@ -3684,7 +3703,11 @@ static int perf_event_read_group(struct perf_event *event,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
 
-	count = perf_event_read_value(leader, &enabled, &running);
+	ret = perf_event_read_values(leader);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	count = perf_event_compute_values(leader, &enabled, &running);
 
 	values[n++] = 1 + leader->nr_siblings;
 	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
@@ -3705,7 +3728,7 @@ static int perf_event_read_group(struct perf_event *event,
 	list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
 		n = 0;
 
-		values[n++] = perf_event_read_value(sub, &enabled, &running);
+		values[n++] = perf_event_compute_values(sub, &enabled, &running);
 		if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
 			values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub);
 
@@ -3728,7 +3751,8 @@ static int perf_event_read_one(struct perf_event *event,
 	u64 values[4];
 	int n = 0;
 
-	values[n++] = perf_event_read_value(event, &enabled, &running);
+	perf_event_read(event);
+	values[n++] = perf_event_compute_values(event, &enabled, &running);
 	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
 		values[n++] = enabled;
 	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-26  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04  8:35 [PATCH 0/4] perf: Implement event group read using txn interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-04  8:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: Add 'flags' parameter to pmu txn interfaces Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-17  6:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26  4:00     ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-04  8:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: Split perf_event_read() and perf_event_count() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-04  8:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Add 'update' parameter to perf_event_read_value() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-17  6:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-04  8:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf/powerpc: Implement group_read() txn interface for 24x7 counters Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-03-17  6:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26  5:57     ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2015-04-01 18:10       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150326055705.GA5593@us.ibm.com \
    --to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@codyps.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).