linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: cmetcalf@ezchip.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: avoid nohz_full cores
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:58:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150331205839.GA32112@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427829959-3023-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:25:59PM -0400, cmetcalf@ezchip.com wrote:
> From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
> 
> When queuing work, we should avoid queuing it on the local cpu if
> we are using WORK_CPU_UNBOUND and the local cpu is nohz_full, since
> the workqueue will mean a later interrupt of the nohz_full process
> that presumably would prefer continuing to have 100% of the core
> without interrupts.
> 
> Likewise, remove the nohz_full cores from unbound workqueues.  If
> all the cores are nohz_full, we leave them in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>

Lai is already working on this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/12/27

All that will be needed after this patchset is to force the desired
unbound workqueue mask on boot.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-31 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-31 19:25 [PATCH] workqueue: avoid nohz_full cores cmetcalf
2015-03-31 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-01  7:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-01 15:46     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-31 20:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-03-31 21:06   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150331205839.GA32112@lerouge \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).