From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932183AbbDANB4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:01:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57744 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932142AbbDANBx (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:01:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:01:38 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, Rusty Russell , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] virtio_balloon: transitional interface Message-ID: <20150401150110-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1427884468-23930-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1427884468-23930-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150401124539-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150401135244.5a8d7ad1.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150401135244.5a8d7ad1.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:52:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:49:02 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:35:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. > > > But it's not a big change to support a transitional > > > balloon device: this has the advantage of supporting > > > existing drivers, transparently. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > --- > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 11 ++++++++-- > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > So all in all 32 LOC added, and 9 out of these > > deal with endian-ness differences. > > > > Seems like a small cost for guests to pay for a clean spec, no? > > > > I'm not opposed to this per se, but I'm not totally convinced of the > usefulness :) > > Seeing the qemu side would be helpful. Cleaning this up for submission, should be ready RSN. -- MST