From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752650AbbDCHXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 03:23:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45190 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491AbbDCHXw (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 03:23:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:23:43 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bhe@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: kernel stack corruption fix Message-ID: <20150403072343.GD22579@dhcp-128-53.nay.redhat.com> References: <20150401045346.GA3461@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com> <551d9a21.c2ed8c0a.2e13.75f6@mx.google.com> <20150403071513.GC22579@dhcp-128-53.nay.redhat.com> <20150403071731.GA15500@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150403071731.GA15500@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1-rc1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/03/15 at 09:17am, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dave Young wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On 04/02/15 at 12:36pm, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:53:46 +0800 > > > Dave Young wrote: > > > > > > > I got below kernel panic during kdump test on Thinkpad T420 laptop: > > > > > > > > [ 0.000000] No NUMA configuration found > > > > [ 0.000000] Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000037ba4fff] > > > > [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is cor > > > > upted in: ffffffff81d21910 r > > > > [ 0.000000] > > > > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.0.0-rc6+ #44 > > > > [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 4236NUC/4236NUC, BIOS 83ET76WW (1.46 ) 07/ > > > > 5/2013 0 > > > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 c70296ddd809e4f6 ffffffff81b67ce8 ffffffff817c > > > > a26 2 > > > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81a61c90 ffffffff81b67d68 ffffffff817b > > > > 8d2 c > > > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000010 ffffffff81b67d78 ffffffff81b67d18 c70296ddd809 > > > > 4f6 e > > > > [ 0.000000] Call Trace: > > > > [ 0.000000] [] dump_stack+0x45/0x57 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] panic+0xd0/0x204 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug+0xe6/0xf2 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] __stack_chk_fail+0x1b/0x20 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug+0xe6/0xf2 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] numa_init+0x1a5/0x520 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_numa_init+0x19/0x3d > > > > [ 0.000000] [] initmem_init+0x9/0xb > > > > [ 0.000000] [] setup_arch+0x94f/0xc82 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? printk+0x55/0x6b > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] start_kernel+0xe8/0x4d6 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_kernel+0x161/0x184 > > > > [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel sta > > > > k is corrupted in: ffffffff81d21910 c > > > > [ 0.000000] > > > > PANIC: early exception 0d rip 10:ffffffff8105d2a6 error 7eb cr2 ffff8800371dd00 > > > > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.0.0-rc6+ #44 0 > > > > [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 4236NUC/4236NUC, BIOS 83ET76WW (1.46 ) 07/ > > > > 5/2013 0 > > > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 c70296ddd809e4f6 ffffffff81b67c60 ffffffff817c > > > > a26 2 > > > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000096 ffffffff81a61c90 ffffffff81b67d68 fffffff00000 > > > > 084 0000000000000a0d 0000000000000a00 0 > > > > [ 0.000000] Call Trace: > > > > [ 0.000000] [] dump_stack+0x45/0x57 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] early_idt_handler+0x90/0xb7 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? native_irq_enable+0x6/0x10 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? panic+0x1c3/0x204 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug+0xe6/0xf2 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] __stack_chk_fail+0x1b/0x20 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug+0xe6/0xf2 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] numa_init+0x1a5/0x520 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_numa_init+0x19/0x3d > > > > [ 0.000000] [] initmem_init+0x9/0xb > > > > [ 0.000000] [] setup_arch+0x94f/0xc82 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? printk+0x55/0x6b > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] start_kernel+0xe8/0x4d6 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > > > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_kernel+0x161/0x184 > > > > [ 0.000000] RIP 0x46 > > > > > > > > This is caused by writing over end of numa mask bitmap. > > > > > > > > numa_clear_kernel_node try to set node id in a mask bitmap, it iterating all > > > > reserved region and assume every regions have valid nid. It is not true because > > > > There's an exception for graphic memory quirks. see function trim_snb_memory > > > > in arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > > > > > > > > It is easily to reproduce the bug in kdump kernel because kdump kernel use > > > > prereserved memory instead of whole memory, but kexec pass other reserved memory > > > > ranges to 2nd kernel as well. like below in my test: > > > > kdump kernel ram 0x2d000000 - 0x37bfffff > > > > One of the reserved regions: 0x40000000 - 0x40100000 > > > > > > > > The above reserved region includes 0x40004000, a page excluded in > > > > trim_snb_memory. For this memblock reserved region the nid is not set it is > > > > still default value MAX_NUMNODES. later node_set callback will set bit > > > > MAX_NUMNODES in nodemask bitmap thus stack corruption happen. > > > > > > > > Fixing this by adding a check, do not call node_set in case nid is MAX_NUMNODES. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young > > > > --- > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > > > Per suggestion from Xishi Qiu, I would like to add below comment in code and repost > > Could I carry with your Reviewed-by line? > > > > /* In case booting with numa=off and only using part of system ram > > * ie. mem=nn[kMG] or in kdump kernel, numa_meminfo may not include all the > > * memblock.reserved memory because trim_snb_memory() reserves specific pages > > * for Sandy Bridge graphics. */ > > Nit: please use the customary (multi-line) comment style: > > /* > * Comment ..... > * ...... goes here. > */ > > specified in Documentation/CodingStyle. Sure, will do. Thanks for telling me. Dave