From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752666AbbDDJfK (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Apr 2015 05:35:10 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:34854 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752208AbbDDJfF (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Apr 2015 05:35:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:34:56 +0200 From: Jonathan Corbet To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Davide Libenzi , Luiz Capitulino , Shuah Khan , Andrea Arcangeli , Joern Engel , Jianguo Wu , Eric B Munson , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch -mm] mm, doc: cleanup and clarify munmap behavior for hugetlb memory fix Message-ID: <20150404113456.55468dc3@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > Don't only specify munmap(2) behavior with respect the hugetlb memory, all > other syscalls get naturally aligned to the native page size of the > processor. Rather, pick out munmap(2) as a specific example. So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it doesn't even come close. What tree was this patch generated against? Thanks, jon