From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:45:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150406104504.41e398d3@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:36:16 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a
> right operand. But it could result in priority inversion in case that
> the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower.
>
> For example, following print format is from new kmem events.
>
> "page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0)
>
> But this was treated as below:
>
> REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)
>
> In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority.
> But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was
> always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation.
>
> With this patch, it can handle it properly like following:
>
> ((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)
Nice catch. One nit.
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> index 6d31b6419d37..604bea5c3fb0 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> @@ -1939,7 +1939,22 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
> goto out_warn_free;
>
> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
> - arg->op.right = right;
> +
> + if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
> + get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
> + struct print_arg tmp;
> +
> + /* swap ops according to the priority */
This isn't really a swap. Better term to use is "rotate".
But other than that,
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> + arg->op.right = right->op.left;
> +
> + tmp = *arg;
> + *arg = *right;
> + *right = tmp;
> +
> + arg->op.left = right;
> + } else {
> + arg->op.right = right;
> + }
>
> } else if (strcmp(token, "[") == 0) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-06 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 5:36 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf kmem: Implement page allocation analysis (v6) Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf kmem: Respect -i option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-08 15:11 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] tracing, mm: Record pfn instead of pointer to struct page Namhyung Kim
2015-04-14 12:16 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf kmem: Analyze page allocator events also Namhyung Kim
2015-04-10 21:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-10 21:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13 6:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13 13:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-14 12:17 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf kmem: Implement stat --page --caller Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-14 2:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf kmem: Support sort keys on page analysis Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf kmem: Add --live option for current allocation stat Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf kmem: Print gfp flags in human readable string Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf kmem: Add kmem.default config option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-04-07 7:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-07 13:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-07 13:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 14:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-08 15:11 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150406104504.41e398d3@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).