From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754473AbbDHQLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 12:11:12 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:40229 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752115AbbDHQLJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 12:11:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:09:55 -0500 From: Felipe Balbi To: Peter Hurley CC: Maxime Ripard , Vinod Koul , Felipe Balbi , Laurent Pinchart , Linux kernel Subject: Re: [4.0-rc+] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:863 dma_async_device_register+0xe0/0x540() Message-ID: <20150408160955.GD1738@saruman.tx.rr.com> Reply-To: References: <54F87075.5020105@hurleysoftware.com> <20150305161236.GG2613@intel.com> <55254EFD.10700@hurleysoftware.com> <20150408155945.GG26727@lukather> <55255232.40700@hurleysoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55255232.40700@hurleysoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 04/08/2015 11:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > >> On 03/05/2015 11:12 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:04:21AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > >>>>> First boot of 4.0-rc+ gave me [1] on a Beaglebone Black due to > >>>>> > >>> The warning is intentional to get driver fixed and give the right beh= aviour > >>> > >>> Felipe had sent a patch for this but that one needs an update > >> > >> Vinod, > >> > >> Felipe's patch never made it to mainline, and this warning is=20 > >> still happening on 4.0-rc7 so please revert for 4.0-final. > >=20 > > That patch isn't introducing any regression. I fail to see how that > > justifies a revert so late in the release cycle. >=20 > Arguably it never should have been introduced in the first place, and > this was at least known since Mar 5 (and likely earlier); arguing that > it's late in the cycle is a bit disingenuous. In Vinod's defense, he asked for changes in my patch which I didn't have time to implement (as of yet). Have been rather busy lately with a bunch of other things, I'll try to get to those changes ASAP, just need to finish up a bisect on another platform. cheers --=20 balbi --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVJVLTAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREoI0P/3pcbjrHuO43/al6Ci3YZlrz wHhZmZIK2egOvvvExKq79QS9SrEsYAvqKzf1L/QofVfgSHWrNoPPQ2KwrjyJwzJO uZQQUdcpBZvQeKcyyCDnfwaGfk/yrMj74A9srf1qZQK/bXwJDpbv5FmvNr2c4RuI BZlGULTC2Q5PjwNPm3jU29UHikrA1DJbShpAb5vLeH0LlU8S/FhJy55lAGV7qXm3 XyVY7UL+ySGAqqJJU5TfanYNWQpy9tDGOvgHWIS4vC6NPAFF3aYuKszEUBQULF9N h2KQHh4hr1Y1irezsEShknCKhwiDYgypKylXI8M/tgw8lba8eKh5eP0M1Q0PwidA tRycY4L7dKGcce8tQxLGJgUbpIaiAcl7cnXSoB5PwPnKYbBjownFzU23jl+u+yoj Hq9z745y39xpWR17ydZQhI2duKiu06e6+cZtQztA7P/Bt8D/hcUF0J6ZKkHtDWVH zAjZ4CcgAsSpuLZtVS0VKPZwtw6Rp9vOfU02sgj3haeGDc5MYJlMQ/LfadoLGmHz 4jzkMkvV5mIAwElk/mbI3WBynNpDAvsr7TlUhA8yGR96XNKhJOXoMbMMe1YpvvEj KRG4Qbaz1Cndln/j89OBHBAO7zASYLDtYnJuZvbRrZ9W8npyvFY0uaOIIXQdsRUs 0YrIjexxDMdHnburAjXQ =3Obd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8nsIa27JVQLqB7/C--