From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755214AbbDNN5B (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:57:01 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34037 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753643AbbDNN4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:56:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:56:47 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Yong Wu Cc: Rob Herring , Joerg Roedel , Matthias Brugger , Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , Daniel Kurtz , Tomasz Figa , Lucas Stach , Catalin Marinas , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , Sasha Hauer , "srv_heupstream@mediatek.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add smi dts binding Message-ID: <20150414135647.GG28709@leverpostej> References: <1425638900-24989-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1425638900-24989-4-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <20150306111338.GD8700@leverpostej> <1429002474.14855.7.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20150414100657.GB28709@leverpostej> <1429019389.16264.5.camel@mhfsdcap03> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1429019389.16264.5.camel@mhfsdcap03> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > smi_common:smi@14022000 { > > > compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi”; > > > reg = <0 0x14022000 0 0x1000>; > > > clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>; > > > clocks-names = “smi_common”; > > > }; > > > > > > larb0: larb@14021000 { > > > compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi-larb”; > > > reg = <0 0x14021000 0 0x1000>; > > > smi = <&smi_common>; > > > clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_LARB0>, > > > <&mmsys MM_SMI_LARB0>; > > > clocks-names = “apb_clk”, “smi_clk”; > > > }; > > > > > > larb1: larb@16010000 { > > > compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi-larb”; > > > reg = <0 0x16010000 0 0x1000>; > > > smi = <&smi_common>; > > > clocks = <&vdecsys VDEC_CKEN>, > > > <&mmsys VDEC_LARB_CKEN>; > > > clocks-names = “apb_clk”, “smi_clk”; > > > }; > > > … > > > In some local arbiter, the source clock of the APB clock and the > > > SMI clock may be the same, like larb0. so the two clocks are the same. > > > And they may be different in other local arbiteres, like larb1. > > > > > > If it is designed like this, is it ok? > > > > That looks pretty good; the clocks and names on the larb nodes seem > > sensible. > > > > The naming of the "smi_common" clock on the smi_common node looks a bit > > odd though. Is that really what the clock input is called? > > > > Mark. > After check with DE, the smi_common clock also have its APB clock > and the smi clock(they have the same clock source). > And I prepare to delete "_clk" in all the clock-names. > So it may be like this: > smi_common:smi@14022000 { > compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi”; > reg = <0 0x14022000 0 0x1000>; > clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>, > <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>; > clocks-names = “apk”,"smi"; > }; > How about this? That looks fine to me. I assume "apk" should be "apb" in the last example. Mark.