From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753852AbbDTRf6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:35:58 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:53536 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753596AbbDTRfy (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:35:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:38 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean Delvare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool Message-ID: <20150420173638.GA1452@katana> References: <1425053816-19804-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425053816-19804-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one > single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there > is no SMBus fallback. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- >=20 > I've been missing such a tool a number of times now, so I finally got aro= und to > writing it myself. As with all I2C tools, it can be dangerous, but it can= also > be very useful when developing. I am not sure if distros should supply it= , I'll > leave that to Jean's experience. For embedded build systems, I think this > should be selectable. It is RFC for now because it needs broader testing = and some > more beautification. However, I've been using it already to test the i2c_= quirk > infrastructure and Renesas I2C controllers. Jean, my tests went well and so I want to brush it up for inclusion into i2c-tools upstream. Any show-stoppers you see from a high-level point of view? --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVNTklAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2InMP/A35+E9oy+kUYOniyroNeflT 9uNkSfI785ygma+hCBHvoMRIMyW7pXsjg6+XhwLsAFOGZRtVpCkixdcOI6UAtRcQ nlwptY5amZ5twxwOTykecrq5ulo8Upq+8W2vmLUMIOJhJPLejttazzCNdvt+wubw 4+dQSdZOySmDQBIm47y7N5Q4F1dao/FTkEte03qfMcWX59rx9qw2iySv6CMZCrr5 06jXrWDbhag1l1OfViPTrXCftpGZIKyshpDjOh3oSTrdIkZladWkVK+wZZZkx9qR 9Qt//YFzwet1RRwnu0wcocZhTaPxkUnnM5CJ9Zwl0vKl/TM3ysLKz6aPhRHoLJRR YOxreA2UhURYWGcU3St8LTkJ5NdPOTQKIUz1ZQYydWmn6t8SdxHaeLapw2kl4dSl 8jMRvMH9CbcAyFLN99LQhs2mixCONvBfsUxXRCXAyC0xGn8RRANF0S3uQ4u6LMuJ kVrg2BQLhMDzyPa88qbnjKw/B4Wgo+AaU6kH/q8oTFUpDcPcjXXdKOW8jDbzvH79 JVFkjrx4e5bXU77yRvOrp+EqqI1OU0YDXklaAXM9oEA7u+IuqziRu/BbcRLDRu/R Kg0g1jRBOpjPvuWlke1bLtq9HzsF05EuCzYZrV2z6q+wCVjTmy3K2uS/UlnppPew 9NVdkt5PcjBy1cizOFX9 =rEkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--