From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030882AbbD1TmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:42:18 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60797 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030737AbbD1TmN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:42:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:42:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Don Zickus Cc: Chris Metcalf , Ulrich Obergfell , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Jones , chai wen , Fabian Frederick , Aaron Tomlin , Ben Zhang , Christoph Lameter , Gilad Ben-Yossef , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog_cpumask sysctl to assist nohz Message-Id: <20150428124211.1e12aab882d213422d6ef2ce@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150428151759.GD98296@redhat.com> References: <20150416152808.GA16270@lerouge> <1429295838-6328-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> <1429295838-6328-2-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> <741962750.4712066.1429700551405.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20150422152134.GW98296@redhat.com> <553E9BA4.6030503@ezchip.com> <20150428151759.GD98296@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:17:59 -0400 Don Zickus wrote: > cc'ing Andrew > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:27:16PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > I've been out on vacation the last ten days, but picking this up > > again now. > > > > I'll wait a bit before putting out a v10, and also address Uli's additional > > emails. Meanwhile, who is the right person to eventually pick up this patchset > > and push it up to Linus? Frederic, Don, Thomas, akpm? v9 is here: > > I usually resubmit watchdog changes with my signoff to Andrew. But would > just my ACK be ok, Andrew? Yep, thanks, I'll take a look.