From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] GHES: Make NMI handler have a single reader
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:22:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428162229.GH19025@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150428153521.GE98296@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Your solution seems much simpler. :-)
... and I love simpler :-)
> I followed up in another email stating I mis-spoke. I forgot this still
> uses the NMI_LOCAL shared NMI. So every perf NMI, will also call the GHES
> handler to make sure NMIs did not piggy back each other. So I don't believe
And this is something we should really fix - perf and RAS should
not have anything to do with each other. But I don't know the NMI
code to even have an idea how. I don't even know whether we can
differentiate NMIs, hell, I can't imagine the hardware giving us a
different NMI reason through get_nmi_reason(). Maybe that byte returned
from NMI_REASON_PORT is too small and hangs on too much legacy crap to
even be usable. Questions over questions...
> the NMI reason lock is called a majority of the time (except when the NMI is
> swallowed, but that is under heavy perf load...).
..
> We both agree the mechanics of the spinlock are overkill here and cause much
> cache contention. Simplifying it to just 'reads' and return removes most of
> the problem.
Right.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 9:22 [RFC PATCH 0/5] GHES NMI handler cleanup Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] GHES: Carve out error queueing in a separate function Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] GHES: Carve out the panic functionality Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] GHES: Panic right after detection Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] GHES: Elliminate double-loop in the NMI handler Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] GHES: Make NMI handler have a single reader Borislav Petkov
2015-04-01 7:45 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-01 13:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-23 8:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-04-23 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-23 18:00 ` Luck, Tony
2015-04-27 20:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 14:30 ` Don Zickus
2015-04-28 14:42 ` Don Zickus
2015-04-28 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 15:35 ` Don Zickus
2015-04-28 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-04-28 18:44 ` Don Zickus
2015-05-04 15:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-27 3:16 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-27 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 0:44 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-28 2:24 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-28 7:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-28 13:38 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-28 13:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-29 0:24 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-29 0:49 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-29 8:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-30 8:05 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-30 8:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-02 0:34 ` Zheng, Lv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150428162229.GH19025@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).