From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Optimize variable_test_bit()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:42:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504134257.GA16478@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150501151630.GH5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:16:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> index cfe3b954d5e4..bcf4fa77c04f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> @@ -313,6 +313,15 @@ static __always_inline int constant_test_bit(long nr, const volatile unsigned lo
>
> static inline int variable_test_bit(long nr, volatile const unsigned long *addr)
> {
> +#ifdef CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
> + asm_volatile_goto ("bt %1, %0\n\t"
> + "jc %l[cc_label]"
> + : : "m" (*(unsigned long *)addr), "Ir" (nr)
> + : : cc_label);
> + return 0;
> +cc_label:
> + return 1;
> +#else
I figured I'd try both jc and jnc versions:
text data bss dec hex filename
12203914 1738112 1081344 15023370 e53d0a defconfig-build/vmlinux
12204228 1738112 1081344 15023684 e53e44 defconfig-build/vmlinux-jc
12203240 1738112 1081344 15022696 e53a68 defconfig-build/vmlinux-jnc
Clearly I picked the wrong one :-) It also shows there is real value in
exposing this decision to GCC.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 15:16 [PATCH] x86: Optimize variable_test_bit() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-01 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-01 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-01 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-01 16:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-01 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-01 17:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 19:02 ` Vladimir Makarov
2015-05-01 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 22:22 ` Vladimir Makarov
2015-05-02 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 15:37 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-04 19:33 ` [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Richard Henderson
2015-05-04 20:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-04 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-04 20:33 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-04 20:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-04 20:57 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-04 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-04 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-04 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-05 9:01 ` Gabriel Paubert
2015-05-05 13:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-05-05 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-05 16:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH] x86: Optimize variable_test_bit() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 18:07 ` Vladimir Makarov
2015-05-04 20:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-04 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504134257.GA16478@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).